Over the last week, ICS collected responses to a survey of child care providers in South Carolina to better understand how the spread of COVID-19 – and the resulting economic impacts – are affecting the child care sector. The child care sector is essential to the health and well-being of millions of South Carolina families and to our economy as a whole.
By Megan Carolan
The National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) recently released its annual State of Preschool report. The “Yearbook” as it’s called is derived from an annual survey of state-funded pre-K programs on topics including access, resources, and quality standards. The report itself covers not only national trends, but provides state-level analysis and rankings to help policymakers and parents gauge the progress of early childhood education.
The national level findings reflect a field in flux as the profile of early childhood increases while states still struggle to recover from the recession.
- Total state funding for pre-K programs increased by more than $116 million across the 40 states plus D.C. that offered pre-K for the full 2013-2014 year, a 1 percent increase in real dollars.
- State pre-K funding per child increased by $61 (inflation-adjusted) from the previous year to $4,125.
- In January 2014, Mississippi became the first state in four years not yet funding pre-K statewide to create a new program. It spent $3 million to enroll 1,774 children, and met all 10 of NIEER’s quality standards benchmarks. While not included in the rankings because the program did not
- Enrollment increased by 8,535 children. Four percent of 3-year-olds and 29 percent of 4-year-olds were served in state-funded pre-K, representing a slight increase in percent of 4-year-olds served.
- An unprecedented seven programs improved their quality standards and gained against NIEER’s Quality Standards Benchmarks checklist.
- More than half a million children, or 40 percent of nationwide enrollment, were served in programs that met fewer than half of the quality standards benchmarks.
While the national picture may indicate slow recovery, geographic differences can be devastating to the opportunities for preschoolers. As the map shows below, 10 state did not offer services for the full 2013-2014 year, though several of these states have since begun investing in new programs. The South has traditionally been a strong region for providing early childhood education, a position that will be strengthened by Mississippi’s new investment which began midway through the 2013-2014 school year. However, not all states are the same:
Clearly, there are large differences in enrollment levels throughout the region. ICS’ home state, South Carolina, ranks 11th for serving 4-year-olds, serving 39 percent of that population; it also enrolls 11 percent of 3-year-olds, also ranking 11th nationwide. However, access only begins to tell the story. The Palmetto State ranks last of all state’s providing pre-K for its spending per-child, with reported amounts of only $1,817 from state sources for each child enrolled across 4K and the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP) programs. While CDEPP met 7 of NIEER’s 10 quality standards benchmarks, 4K, which serves more than twice as many children, meets just 5. We’ve written previously about the need to invest more in 4K to ensure that children served start life with their best foot forward. While the Yearbook focuses primarily on state-funded pre-K, it also offers information on Head Start and special education enrollment;
Before joining ICS earlier this year, I was the project manager on this report. It is an incredibly rich data source for understanding how states were investing in the most recent 2013-2014 school year, and in understanding how they have progressed since 2001. The Yearbook helps policymakers develop a roadmap for where we are and where we need to go to ensure that our nation’s youngest learners receive the opportunities they need. If you’re interested in learning more about a state’s progress, check out the state profiles; for more detailed information to compare state policies, Appendix A has the full data set collected in the survey.